Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

A woman in a sleeveless green dress stands at a clear podium, speaking into a handheld microphone. She has long, dark hair and wears a pink ribbon pin, symbolizing breast cancer awareness. A projection screen behind her shows a live feed of her speech.

Breast cancer survivor Karla Mingo shares her journey to inspire women and emphasize the life-saving importance of early detection.

A smiling young woman with braided hair, wearing a light-colored blazer and watch, holding a grey coffee mug with both hands. She is sitting in a modern, well-lit office space with green plants in the background.
Black women deserve to practice self-care, even while navigating the demands of the workplace.
istock - PeopleImages
Empowering Minority Women Through Genetic Testing: Bridging Gaps in Awareness and Access

Kimberly VanYsseldyk, MN, FNP-BC, AOCNP, ACGN, CGRA — a highly respected Nurse Practitioner —works diligently with the National Consortium of Breast Centers to improve information about Cancer Genetic Risk Assessments.

Research

Exposed: The Hidden Dangers Lurking in Raw Milk Consumption

Exposed: The Hidden Dangers Lurking in Raw Milk Consumption

Raw milk, unpasteurized and untreated, has garnered attention in recent years as a “natural” alternative to conventional dairy products. However, consuming raw milk comes with inherent risks that can pose serious health hazards. It’s important to delve into the potential dangers associated with raw milk consumption, backed by scientific research and expert opinions, to raise awareness and promote informed decision-making regarding dairy choices.

Bacterial Contamination:


One of the primary concerns associated with raw milk is the risk of bacterial contamination. Raw milk can harbor harmful pathogens such as Salmonella, Escherichia coli (E. coli), Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter, which can cause foodborne illnesses ranging from mild gastrointestinal symptoms to severe complications, including kidney failure and meningitis (Oliver et al., 2005). The absence of pasteurization, a process that involves heating milk to kill pathogens, increases the likelihood of bacterial contamination in raw milk.

Public Health Concerns:

The consumption of raw milk poses public health risks beyond individual health consequences. Outbreaks of foodborne illnesses linked to raw milk consumption have been documented worldwide, leading to hospitalizations, economic losses, and strain on public health resources (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017). Despite regulatory measures in place to limit the sale and distribution of raw milk, outbreaks continue to occur, underscoring the ongoing public health challenge associated with unpasteurized dairy products.

Vulnerable Populations:

Certain populations are at higher risk of experiencing severe complications from consuming raw milk. Infants, young children, pregnant women, older adults, and individuals with weakened immune systems are particularly susceptible to foodborne illnesses and may face more severe outcomes if exposed to contaminated raw milk (Langer et al., 2012). Given the potential health consequences, regulatory agencies and health organizations advise against the consumption of raw milk, especially for vulnerable populations.

Legal and Regulatory Landscape:

The sale and distribution of raw milk are subject to varying regulations across jurisdictions, with some regions permitting its sale under certain conditions and others banning it altogether. Proponents of raw milk argue for consumer choice and the preservation of traditional food practices, while opponents emphasize the importance of public health and food safety standards (Kendall et al., 2013). The debate surrounding raw milk regulation reflects broader tensions between individual freedoms and public health priorities.

Promoting Informed Choices:

In light of the documented risks associated with raw milk consumption, promoting informed decision-making is essential. Consumers should be aware of the potential dangers posed by raw milk and consider factors such as personal health status, regulatory context, and food safety practices when making dairy choices. Education campaigns, public awareness initiatives, and transparent communication about the risks and benefits of different dairy products can empower consumers to make safer and healthier choices.

While raw milk may appeal to proponents of natural and traditional food practices, its consumption carries significant health risks that cannot be ignored. Bacterial contamination, foodborne illness outbreaks, and heightened susceptibility among vulnerable populations underscore the dangers associated with consuming unpasteurized dairy products. By raising awareness, advocating for evidence-based policies, and promoting informed decision-making, we can mitigate the risks associated with raw milk consumption and safeguard public health.

References:

  • Oliver, S. P., Boor, K. J., Murphy, S. C., & Murinda, S. E. (2005). Food safety hazards associated with consumption of raw milk. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease, 2(4), 379-390.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Raw Milk Questions and Answers. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/rawmilk/raw-milk-questions-and-answers.html
  • Langer, A. J., Ayers, T., Grass, J., Lynch, M., Angulo, F. J., & Mahon, B. E. (2012). Nonpasteurized dairy products, disease outbreaks, and state laws—United States, 1993–2006. Emerging infectious diseases, 18(3), 385.
  • Kendall, P., Farber, J. M., & Harlander, S. K. (2013). The regulation of raw milk cheese in Canada: a review. Journal of Food Protection, 76(1), 208-222.

More Stories

Oncoplastic Surgery Is Redefining Wholeness for Black Breast Cancer Survivors

Ronda Henry-Tillman, M.D., a surgical oncologist specializing in breast cancer, is dedicated to ensuring that all women have access to the best possible options for their breast surgery.

Oncoplastic Surgery Is Redefining Wholeness for Black Breast Cancer Survivors

For many breast cancer patients, surviving the disease is just one part of the journey. The path forward often includes physical healing, emotional restoration, and reclaiming one’s sense of self. That’s where oncoplastic surgery is changing the landscape—offering women not only life-saving procedures but also renewed confidence and dignity.

This innovative approach blends oncology (cancer surgery) with plastic and reconstructive techniques, allowing surgeons to remove tumors while reshaping the breast for a more natural appearance. The result? A holistic healing process that honors both survival and self-image.

Keep ReadingShow less
Wellness Through a Cultural Lens: What Traditional Healing Can Teach Us

Wellness Through a Cultural Lens: What Traditional Healing Can Teach Us

The idea of wellness has taken center stage in today's world, but its definition changes from one culture to another. Modern health trends push workout plans, eating strategies, and self-care habits, while old-school healing methods give a wider more complete view of health and wellness. To grasp what health and wellness mean, we need to look past common beliefs and tap into the knowledge found in age-old cultural practices.

Various ancient healing methods see wellness as a living harmony among the mind, body, and spirit tied to nature and society. Worldwide Native medicine Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and other healing schools of thought offer a treasure trove of wisdom that tests and enhances modern wellness concepts. Looking into these customs can give useful health and wellness advice helping people create a deeper and more significant way to care for themselves.

Keep ReadingShow less
Silent Surge: As Diseases Spread, CDC Quiet on Public Warnings
Photo by CDC on Unsplash

Silent Surge: As Diseases Spread, CDC Quiet on Public Warnings

In recent months, a concerning pattern has emerged in the U.S. public health landscape: while infectious diseases are quietly on the rise, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has been notably more restrained in its public communications compared to earlier in the COVID-19 pandemic. From respiratory illnesses to measles outbreaks, the spread of disease is increasing—but without the loud, consistent messaging that once guided public behavior and preparedness.

This shift raises questions about public risk, trust in institutions, and the evolving role of the CDC in post-pandemic America.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark
File:FDA Sign & Bldg 21 at Entrance (5204602349).jpg - Wikimedia ...

A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark

As Americans continue to trust that the food on their plates is safe, troubling revelations suggest that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may be keeping critical information under wraps. Multiple E. coli outbreaks have sickened dozens—some severely—while the agency has withheld key details such as food sources, affected regions, and even the names of implicated suppliers. In a system built on public trust and transparency, these omissions raise urgent questions: Why is the FDA staying silent, and what are the consequences for consumers?

Delayed Disclosures and Withheld Information

In December 2024, the FDA acknowledged an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 that affected at least 67 people. Despite initiating traceback efforts, the agency failed to disclose key details such as where the cases occurred or which foods were being investigated.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading
text
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the myth that vaccines cause autism remains one of the most damaging health misconceptions of our time. Somehow, no matter how many scientific studies are conducted, no matter how many papers are published, and no matter how much correct information is spread, "vaccines cause autism" is too widely accepted. The origin of this belief is rooted in a discredited study, but its consequences have rippled through society for decades—undermining public trust, sparking outbreaks of preventable diseases, and endangering countless lives.

The Origins of the Vaccine-Autism Myth

The modern iteration of this myth began in 1998 with a study published by Andrew Wakefield in The Lancet, which suggested a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in children (Wakefield et al., 1998). The study was based on just 12 children, lacked a control group, and relied on anecdotal parental reports. It was later revealed that Wakefield had financial conflicts of interest and had manipulated the data.

Keep ReadingShow less
×