Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Health Topics

Breakthroughs in Spinal Cord Injuries: A Journey Toward Recovery and Hope

Breakthroughs in Spinal Cord Injuries: A Journey Toward Recovery and Hope
Photo by Kristine Wook on Unsplash

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) Awareness Month, observed every September, is a time to recognize the individuals living with SCI, raise awareness about the condition, and highlight advancements in medical research. Spinal cord injuries can have life-altering effects, and the community continues to push for better treatments, support systems, and understanding of the complexities involved.

History of Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month

The establishment of Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month came from the collective effort of advocacy groups, medical professionals, and individuals affected by SCI. It was officially recognized by the U.S. Senate in 2014 through a resolution that aimed to shed light on the unique challenges faced by individuals with spinal cord injuries. The resolution sought to raise public awareness about the impact of SCI and advocate for better healthcare, rehabilitation services, and accessibility for those affected.


Organizations such as the United Spinal Association and the Christopher & Dana Reeve Foundation have been at the forefront of these efforts, supporting SCI research, education, and community engagement. Every September, these organizations promote public education initiatives, outreach programs, and advocacy for better legislation to protect the rights of individuals with spinal cord injuries.

The Impact of Spinal Cord Injuries

Spinal cord injuries affect an estimated 300,000 people in the U.S., with approximately 17,000 new cases each year. The causes of these injuries are diverse, ranging from car accidents to sports injuries and falls. The physical, emotional, and financial toll can be overwhelming, with the cost of healthcare and rehabilitation services being particularly burdensome.

Spinal cord injuries can lead to paralysis, loss of motor functions, and other complications, depending on the severity and location of the injury. Rehabilitation plays a crucial role in helping individuals regain some level of independence, but the challenges remain immense.

New Advancements in Spinal Cord Injury Treatment

Recent years have seen significant advancements in SCI research, offering hope for improved outcomes and quality of life for those affected. Below are some key breakthroughs:

  1. Stem Cell Research
    Stem cell therapies have shown promise in treating spinal cord injuries. Researchers are exploring how stem cells can regenerate damaged spinal tissue and promote healing. Recent clinical trials have shown that stem cells can be injected into injured areas to stimulate nerve regeneration, potentially restoring motor function and sensation.
  2. Electrical Stimulation
    Electrical stimulation technologies, like epidural stimulation, have emerged as one of the most promising innovations for SCI recovery. This involves implanting a device in the spine that sends electrical signals to the nerves, helping individuals with SCI regain some level of voluntary movement. Several patients with SCI have experienced the ability to stand and even walk with assistance after using these devices.
  3. Robotic Exoskeletons
    Robotic exoskeletons are wearable devices designed to assist individuals with SCI in standing, walking, and regaining some mobility. While they are not a cure, exoskeletons have shown tremendous potential in rehabilitation, improving patients' overall health by enhancing circulation, reducing muscle atrophy, and giving them greater independence.
  4. Neuroprosthetics
    Neuroprosthetics, devices that connect directly to the nervous system, have been making strides in improving functional recovery. By restoring lost sensory or motor functions, these devices can allow individuals with SCI to perform daily tasks that were previously impossible. This advancement holds the potential for greater autonomy in everyday life for those affected by SCI.
  5. Gene Therapy
    Gene therapy has also emerged as a potential solution for SCI. Researchers are studying ways to alter gene expression in injured spinal cords to promote nerve regeneration and functional recovery. Although still in early stages, gene therapy could one day provide a method to reverse some effects of spinal cord injuries.

Looking Forward

While there is still no cure for spinal cord injuries, the scientific and medical communities are making significant strides. Public awareness and advocacy remain critical for ensuring continued funding for research and improving the quality of life for those living with SCI. Spinal Cord Injury Awareness Month provides an opportunity to reflect on the progress made, acknowledge the challenges that remain, and highlight the importance of advancing treatments and rehabilitation efforts.

As these innovations continue to develop, there is hope that future treatments will not only improve the quality of life for individuals with SCI but also pave the way for potential cures.

More Stories

Health Is Wealth: The Hidden Cost of a Toxic Food Supply

Columnist Michelle Pettes encourages us to prioritize our overall health and well-being.

iStock / David Prado

Health Is Wealth: The Hidden Cost of a Toxic Food Supply

“A person who has their health has a thousand dreams. A person who is unhealthy has but one.”

Health is the foundation upon which all dreams are built. Without it, aspirations fade, replaced by the singular desire to regain what has been lost. Nowhere is this more relevant than in the African American community, where systemic barriers, economic disadvantages, and a toxic food supply fuel a crisis of diet-related diseases that shackle generations to illness and dependency.

Keep ReadingShow less
10,000 Steps a Day? Here’s What Science Really Says About How Many Steps Daily to Take

10,000 Steps a Day? Here’s What Science Really Says About How Many Steps Daily to Take

The notion of taking 10,000 steps a day has been considered the goal of physical exercise for the last decade. This makes sense considering this number is promoted by so many fitness trackers, health applications, and wellness programs. But now researchers are contemplating whether we truly need to reach 10,000 steps or if there is a more realistic target. If current research is any indication, we might be surprised.

The 10,000 steps goal was first conceived in Japan during the 1960s when an attempt was made to market a pedometer called “Manpo-kei,” which translates to the 10,000-step meter. The goal of selling these pedometers was to increase health and fitness, so naturally the estimate of 10,000 became an industry standard – despite the lack of scientific evidence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Breaking Generational Health Patterns—One Choice at a Time

Breaking Generational Health Patterns—One Choice at a Time

Health means more than just not being sick; it's a lifelong process that genes, lifestyle, surroundings, and culture all affect. Many families hand down not only customs and beliefs but also health patterns, some good, others bad. These deep-rooted behaviors have an impact on everything from what we eat and how we exercise to how we handle stress and bounce back from tough times. Recognizing these patterns and choosing to change them can improve not just our well-being but also the health of our kids and grandkids.

Getting out of bad health habits needs you to notice, learn, and do something about them. A lot of the health problems we face now, like diabetes, heart issues, and mental struggles, aren't just because of our genes. Our way of life and the things we've picked up along the way have a big impact on them too. This is where repeated health behaviors come in. When people see health patterns in their family, they can choose to start healthier routines. This can lead to a better future for their kids and grandkids.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark
File:FDA Sign & Bldg 21 at Entrance (5204602349).jpg - Wikimedia ...

A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark

As Americans continue to trust that the food on their plates is safe, troubling revelations suggest that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may be keeping critical information under wraps. Multiple E. coli outbreaks have sickened dozens—some severely—while the agency has withheld key details such as food sources, affected regions, and even the names of implicated suppliers. In a system built on public trust and transparency, these omissions raise urgent questions: Why is the FDA staying silent, and what are the consequences for consumers?

Delayed Disclosures and Withheld Information

In December 2024, the FDA acknowledged an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 that affected at least 67 people. Despite initiating traceback efforts, the agency failed to disclose key details such as where the cases occurred or which foods were being investigated.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading
text
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the myth that vaccines cause autism remains one of the most damaging health misconceptions of our time. Somehow, no matter how many scientific studies are conducted, no matter how many papers are published, and no matter how much correct information is spread, "vaccines cause autism" is too widely accepted. The origin of this belief is rooted in a discredited study, but its consequences have rippled through society for decades—undermining public trust, sparking outbreaks of preventable diseases, and endangering countless lives.

The Origins of the Vaccine-Autism Myth

The modern iteration of this myth began in 1998 with a study published by Andrew Wakefield in The Lancet, which suggested a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in children (Wakefield et al., 1998). The study was based on just 12 children, lacked a control group, and relied on anecdotal parental reports. It was later revealed that Wakefield had financial conflicts of interest and had manipulated the data.

Keep ReadingShow less
×