Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Research

No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading

No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading
text
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the myth that vaccines cause autism remains one of the most damaging health misconceptions of our time. Somehow, no matter how many scientific studies are conducted, no matter how many papers are published, and no matter how much correct information is spread, "vaccines cause autism" is too widely accepted. The origin of this belief is rooted in a discredited study, but its consequences have rippled through society for decades—undermining public trust, sparking outbreaks of preventable diseases, and endangering countless lives.

The Origins of the Vaccine-Autism Myth

The modern iteration of this myth began in 1998 with a study published by Andrew Wakefield in The Lancet, which suggested a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in children (Wakefield et al., 1998). The study was based on just 12 children, lacked a control group, and relied on anecdotal parental reports. It was later revealed that Wakefield had financial conflicts of interest and had manipulated the data.


In 2010, The Lancet fully retracted the article, and Wakefield lost his medical license (Godlee et al., 2011). Multiple large-scale studies since then have found no link between vaccines and autism. For example, a 2019 study of over 650,000 children in Denmark found no increased autism risk in vaccinated children compared to unvaccinated ones (Hviid et al., 2019).

What the Science Actually Says

Dozens of studies across millions of children have found no causal relationship between vaccines and autism. A meta-analysis covering over 1.2 million children concluded that vaccines do not cause autism or autism spectrum disorders (Taylor et al., 2014).

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the World Health Organization (WHO), and the American Academy of Pediatrics all confirm that vaccines are safe, effective, and critical for preventing serious illnesses—and none of them cause autism.

The Cost of Misinformation

While the science is clear, the damage caused by misinformation is real and ongoing. Belief in this myth has contributed to vaccine hesitancy and refusal, leading to dangerous consequences. In 2019, the U.S. saw its highest number of measles cases in 25 years—most of them among unvaccinated children (CDC, 2019). Measles, which was declared eliminated in the U.S. in 2000, made a dramatic comeback due to pockets of low vaccination.

Beyond disease outbreaks, this misinformation sows distrust in public health institutions. It gives rise to conspiracy theories and diverts attention and funding from actual autism research, delaying progress for individuals and families who need answers and support.

Why This Myth Persists

Cognitive biases, emotional appeals, and the rapid spread of disinformation online help fuel the vaccine-autism myth. Parents looking for answers about a child's autism diagnosis may find false comfort in a clear (if incorrect) explanation. Social media platforms and anti-vaccine communities often amplify these narratives, using emotionally charged stories that are far more shareable than dry scientific data.

The Path Forward: Education and Empathy

Combating vaccine misinformation requires more than just facts. It demands empathy, clear communication, and collaboration with trusted voices in the community—especially doctors, nurses, and public health professionals. Addressing parents’ concerns respectfully, sharing real stories of those harmed by vaccine-preventable diseases, and providing transparent, evidence-based information can all make a difference.

The stakes are too high to ignore. Vaccines are one of the greatest achievements in modern medicine. When people are misled into believing they are dangerous, we all suffer the consequences.

References

  • Wakefield, A. J., et al. (1998). Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet. [Retracted]
  • Godlee, F., Smith, J., & Marcovitch, H. (2011). Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ, 342, c7452.
  • Hviid, A., Hansen, J. V., Frisch, M., & Melbye, M. (2019). Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: a nationwide cohort study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 170(8), 513–520.
  • Taylor, L. E., Swerdfeger, A. L., & Eslick, G. D. (2014). Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32(29), 3623–3629.
  • CDC. (2019). Measles Cases and Outbreaks. https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html

More Stories

A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark
File:FDA Sign & Bldg 21 at Entrance (5204602349).jpg - Wikimedia ...

A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark

As Americans continue to trust that the food on their plates is safe, troubling revelations suggest that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may be keeping critical information under wraps. Multiple E. coli outbreaks have sickened dozens—some severely—while the agency has withheld key details such as food sources, affected regions, and even the names of implicated suppliers. In a system built on public trust and transparency, these omissions raise urgent questions: Why is the FDA staying silent, and what are the consequences for consumers?

Delayed Disclosures and Withheld Information

In December 2024, the FDA acknowledged an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 that affected at least 67 people. Despite initiating traceback efforts, the agency failed to disclose key details such as where the cases occurred or which foods were being investigated.

Keep ReadingShow less
Dr. Nathalie Johnson Honored with the Impact Award at NCoBC 2025

NCBC President Jennifer Plichta, MD, MS, FACS, CGRA, presents Dr. Nathalie Johnson, MD, FACS, with the 2025 Impact Award.

Dr. Nathalie Johnson Honored with the Impact Award at NCoBC 2025

Las Vegas, NV – March 27, 2025 – Dr. Nathalie Johnson, a distinguished leader in breast cancer care and advocacy, was presented with the prestigious Impact Award at the NCoBC 2025 34th Interdisciplinary Breast Center Conference, held at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. The NCBC Impact Award recognizes individuals whose pioneering contributions have significantly advanced breast cancer care, research, and advocacy.

The award was presented to Dr. Johnson by NCBC Board President, Jennifer Plichta, MD, MS, FACS, CGRA, in recognition of her unwavering commitment to improving breast cancer treatment, education, and patient care.

Keep ReadingShow less
Is It Just Stress or Something More? Understanding Hormonal Imbalances

Is It Just Stress or Something More? Understanding Hormonal Imbalances

In our modern day, many people ignore stress as part of the everyday normal. Severe feelings of being overwhelmed by work deadlines, financial crises, personal responsibilities, etc can cause numerous emotional and physical problems. If the problems of chronic fatigue, mood swings, weight fluctuations, or even irregular periods continue despite the implementation of stress management systems, it is perhaps wise to consider the possibility of a hormonal imbalance.

A person's hormonal health is very central to their health. The body relies on a network of glands called the endocrine system designed to produce and regulate hormones, and this system affects nearly every physiological function within a human, their metabolism, their mood, and, even their immune response. If there is some kind of disruption to this balance, the outcomes can go beyond basic stress symptoms. How does one differentiate between stress discomfort and the more sinister internal hormone imbalance? Here, we will answer some important questions concerning stress discomfort, and hormonal health.

Keep ReadingShow less

Recent Ban of Red Dye 3 and Its Complicated History

I don't know about everyone else, but there is nothing better than a maraschino cherry on top of an ice cream sundae. I'm also a sucker for ice cream and candy, but it seems like some of my favorite foods are soon going to be getting a makeover. For decades, Red Dye 3 (also known as erythrosine) has been a contentious ingredient in food and consumer products. Recently, this synthetic dye has been banned in the United States, sparking significant public discourse about food safety and regulatory practices. There is a history of Red Dye 3. There are reasons for its prohibition, and its implications for consumers and manufacturers.

What is Red Dye 3?

Red Dye 3 is a synthetic food coloring derived from petroleum. It has been widely used in candies, baked goods, beverages, cosmetics, and medications to impart a bright red hue. Despite its aesthetic appeal, concerns about its safety have loomed for years. it is important to note that Red Dye 3 isn't limited to just foods. It can also be found in medications such as Gabapentin (a nerve pain medication), Prozac (an antidepressant), and Acetaminophen.

Keep ReadingShow less
Are Neurodevelopmental conditions actually on the rise?
Photo by Hiki App on Unsplash

Are Neurodevelopmental conditions actually on the rise?

In recent decades, there has been a striking increase in diagnoses of neurodevelopmental conditions like autism, attention deficit disorder (ADD), and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). We see more organizations to address these issues. We heard about it more in the news. People have theories about this being caused by the things we eat or, on the other side, that we are better at diagnosing diseases. This surge has sparked debates and curiosity: Are these conditions becoming more common, or is our understanding of the brain simply evolving? The answer, as it turns out, is a mix of both.

The Numbers at a Glance

  • Autism diagnoses in the United States have increased from 1 in 150 children in 2000 to 1 in 36 in 2023, according to the CDC.
  • ADHD diagnoses among children rose from 6.1% in 1997 to 10.2% in 2016, per the National Survey of Children's Health.
  • Similar trends have been observed for other conditions like ADD, dyslexia, and even sensory processing disorders.

This rise may seem alarming, but it's essential to examine the factors driving these numbers.

Keep ReadingShow less
×