Skip to content
Search

Latest Stories

Health Topics

Do Certain Ethnic Groups Have a Higher Risk of Diabetes?

According to the National Diabetes Statistics Report (2020), a periodic publication of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 10.5 percent of people in the United States have diabetes. This means 1 out of every 10 people in the United States has diabetes.

It is known that type 1 diabetes is hereditary and type 2 diabetes is a lifestyle disorder. However, people of some ethnic groups have a gene for insulin resistance contributing to type 2 diabetes. Other than diet and lifestyle factors, you can also develop diabetes if you belong to a certain ethnic group. Let us have a look at the statistics.


Scientists have found different prevalence rates of diabetes among people of different ehtnic populations in the United States.

Table 1. Prevalence rates of diabetes in various ethnic populations

Ethnic population Prevalence of diagnosed diabetes (%)
American Indians/Alaskan Natives14.7
Non-Hispanic African Americans11.7
Hispanics12.5
Non-Hispanic Asians9.2
Non-Hispanic Caucasians7.5
  • Pacific Islanders, Alaskan natives and American Indians have the highest prevalence rates of diabetes among groups studied in the United States Census.
  • A higher percentage of African Americans and Asian Americans have diabetes compared to Caucasian. African American adults are more likely (60 percent more) to be diagnosed with diabetes than non-Hispanic Cacausian adults.

Probable reasons why certain ethnic populations have diabetes

Why certain ethnic populations have more people with diabetes than other groups is a simple question with a complex answer. The exact reason remains unknown, but experts speculate that genetic factors and environmental factors are at play.

Body type

A higher percentage of body fat makes people more likely to get diabetes. Particularly, it is the distribution of fat in the body that matters the most. If it is concentrated around the abdomen, the risk is higher.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), Asians tend to have more body fat and abdominal fat than fat under the skin (subcutaneous fat). It is this deep fat centered around the abdomen that makes the insulin less effective on circulating blood sugar. Caucasians tend to have less abdominal fat than Asians..

Potassium levels

Low potassium levels may make a person more likely to make less insulin. That could lead to high blood sugar levels. According to research, this makes them more likely to get type 2 diabetes than those with normal potassium levels. African Americans have lower potassium levels than Caucasians. Hence, they are more likely to develop diabetes than Caucasians.

Researchers found that a diet high in glucose and saturated fats causes low levels of inflammation in the body. This is called glucotoxicity and lipotoxicity, respectively, and it damages the beta cells.

Can people who belong to at-risk ethnic populations prevent diabetes?

Everyone can eat a healthy diet and get regular exercise to lower their risk of diabetes.

  • Keep your weight in check. Exercise regularly and aim to get at least 30 minutes of moderate physical activity at least five days a week.
  • Eat a healthy diet. Cut back on sugar, processed foods and saturated fats. Eat a lot of fruits and vegetables, whole grains and nuts. Eat fish to get a rich source of good fats (omega-3 fatty acids).
  • Check blood sugar levels regularly.

More Stories

Health Is Wealth: The Hidden Cost of a Toxic Food Supply

Columnist Michelle Pettes encourages us to prioritize our overall health and well-being.

iStock / David Prado

Health Is Wealth: The Hidden Cost of a Toxic Food Supply

“A person who has their health has a thousand dreams. A person who is unhealthy has but one.”

Health is the foundation upon which all dreams are built. Without it, aspirations fade, replaced by the singular desire to regain what has been lost. Nowhere is this more relevant than in the African American community, where systemic barriers, economic disadvantages, and a toxic food supply fuel a crisis of diet-related diseases that shackle generations to illness and dependency.

Keep ReadingShow less
10,000 Steps a Day? Here’s What Science Really Says About How Many Steps Daily to Take

10,000 Steps a Day? Here’s What Science Really Says About How Many Steps Daily to Take

The notion of taking 10,000 steps a day has been considered the goal of physical exercise for the last decade. This makes sense considering this number is promoted by so many fitness trackers, health applications, and wellness programs. But now researchers are contemplating whether we truly need to reach 10,000 steps or if there is a more realistic target. If current research is any indication, we might be surprised.

The 10,000 steps goal was first conceived in Japan during the 1960s when an attempt was made to market a pedometer called “Manpo-kei,” which translates to the 10,000-step meter. The goal of selling these pedometers was to increase health and fitness, so naturally the estimate of 10,000 became an industry standard – despite the lack of scientific evidence.

Keep ReadingShow less
Breaking Generational Health Patterns—One Choice at a Time

Breaking Generational Health Patterns—One Choice at a Time

Health means more than just not being sick; it's a lifelong process that genes, lifestyle, surroundings, and culture all affect. Many families hand down not only customs and beliefs but also health patterns, some good, others bad. These deep-rooted behaviors have an impact on everything from what we eat and how we exercise to how we handle stress and bounce back from tough times. Recognizing these patterns and choosing to change them can improve not just our well-being but also the health of our kids and grandkids.

Getting out of bad health habits needs you to notice, learn, and do something about them. A lot of the health problems we face now, like diabetes, heart issues, and mental struggles, aren't just because of our genes. Our way of life and the things we've picked up along the way have a big impact on them too. This is where repeated health behaviors come in. When people see health patterns in their family, they can choose to start healthier routines. This can lead to a better future for their kids and grandkids.

Keep ReadingShow less
A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark
File:FDA Sign & Bldg 21 at Entrance (5204602349).jpg - Wikimedia ...

A Deadly E. coli Outbreak Spread Across 15 States — and the FDA Kept Us in the Dark

As Americans continue to trust that the food on their plates is safe, troubling revelations suggest that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) may be keeping critical information under wraps. Multiple E. coli outbreaks have sickened dozens—some severely—while the agency has withheld key details such as food sources, affected regions, and even the names of implicated suppliers. In a system built on public trust and transparency, these omissions raise urgent questions: Why is the FDA staying silent, and what are the consequences for consumers?

Delayed Disclosures and Withheld Information

In December 2024, the FDA acknowledged an outbreak of E. coli O157:H7 that affected at least 67 people. Despite initiating traceback efforts, the agency failed to disclose key details such as where the cases occurred or which foods were being investigated.

Keep ReadingShow less
No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading
text
Photo by Annie Spratt on Unsplash

No, Vaccines Don’t Cause Autism. But the Lie Is Still Spreading

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the myth that vaccines cause autism remains one of the most damaging health misconceptions of our time. Somehow, no matter how many scientific studies are conducted, no matter how many papers are published, and no matter how much correct information is spread, "vaccines cause autism" is too widely accepted. The origin of this belief is rooted in a discredited study, but its consequences have rippled through society for decades—undermining public trust, sparking outbreaks of preventable diseases, and endangering countless lives.

The Origins of the Vaccine-Autism Myth

The modern iteration of this myth began in 1998 with a study published by Andrew Wakefield in The Lancet, which suggested a link between the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine and autism in children (Wakefield et al., 1998). The study was based on just 12 children, lacked a control group, and relied on anecdotal parental reports. It was later revealed that Wakefield had financial conflicts of interest and had manipulated the data.

Keep ReadingShow less
×